And I love that I have a professional caliber 35mm lens for a fraction of what the name brand lens would cost. I love how this lens performs, its sharpness and contrast. I’ve been shooting the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens for several months now and I’ve changed my tune. A little disdainful is probably more accurate. So when I saw some really good portrait and wedding photographers raving about their Sigma lenses, I was skeptical at best. We would literally play rock-paper-scissors to see who got to shoot the good glass and who was left with the third party lenses like Sigma. But they couldn’t stand up to the quality of their brand-name counterparts. These lenses were cheap and therefore more readily available to poor college students shooting for photography classes or the school newspaper. (Spoiler alert…I’m a believer.) My history with 3rd party lensesīack when I was learning photography in the late 1990s, third party lenses were well, let’s say subpar, to be polite. We’ll talk specifications and real-world performance, and I’ll tell you if the lens has made me into a Sigma convert or solidified my place as a Nikon snob. Today, I’ll give you my review of the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens after shooting with it for about six months. After lots of research, I joined the legions of Sigma owners. ![]() I’d read reviews but my experience with Sigma lenses was less than satisfactory. When I needed a fast 35mm lens for my kit, I settled on the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens. ![]() But is the Sigma 35mm f/1.4 Art lens worth the hype? Photographers everywhere rave about their Sigma Art lenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |